The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsA Trump-Xi AI hotline is not governance. ASEAN must build its own
A bilateral AI hotline between Washington and Beijing will manage the superpower crises, but it won’t save Southeast Asia from the collateral damage of frontier tech.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Set as preferred source
United States President Donald Trump (center right) salutes after a B1 bomber flyby on Sept. 23, 2026, while welcoming Chinese President Xi Jinping (center left) at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. (AFP/Brendan Smialowski)
T
he most consequential artificial intelligence outcome of the recent Donald Trump-Xi Jinping summit was not governance. It was crisis communication.
Washington and Beijing agreed to establish regular bilateral dialogues on what they now officially designate “Super Intelligence”, alongside an emergency channel for serious AI-related incidents. The next exchange is expected by next month.
While these are prudent first steps, they establish neither shared standards nor reporting thresholds nor binding restraints. ASEAN should register that distinction immediately.
Southeast Asia is poised to deploy frontier systems built by American and Chinese tech champions across its finance, logistics, public administration and critical infrastructure. Yet the region has no seat at this bilateral table and suffers from starkly uneven domestic capacity to evaluate advanced models. A superpower hotline cannot substitute for regional operational safeguards.
The summit was followed days later by a complementary development: President Trump convened leaders from six major American firms, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and Nvidia, to sign a voluntary White House accord on frontier model safety. Though functionally separate from the diplomatic summit, the industry pact completes an emerging superpower consensus: accelerate, audit and communicate, but do not constrain.
Terminology should not obscure reality. Superintelligence formally describes a hypothetical architecture surpassing human capabilities across virtually all economically and intellectually consequential tasks. It does not exist today.
Trump’s broad “Super Intelligence” moniker merely offers Washington and Beijing political cover to address extreme cyber, biological and loss-of-control hazards without locking themselves into rigorous technical definitions.
