The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe Aug. 27 demonstrations: From the streets to the MPR?
While the crowds take to the streets, the real political battle is being waged behind closed doors - where public anger may simply be the opening move in an elite power reshuffle.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Set as preferred source
Locked out: Hundreds of people crowd the gate of the Senayan Legislative Complex in Central Jakarta on Aug. 27, 2026, during a mass demonstration that demanded passage of the long-delayed asset forfeiture bill and tougher punishment for corruptors. (JP/Iqro Rinaldi)
A
s happened in the past, the demonstrations on Thursday appeared to extend beyond grassroots frustration. Behind the public grievances lies a broader strategic question: Are people simply venting accumulated discontent, or has the mobilization become an arena where competing elite interests converge and seek leverage?
While street action rarely forces sudden regime collapse, it reliably generates pressure that can alter the balance of power and open new avenues for political bargaining.
Social media narratives have suggested that factions aligned with former president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo want to unseat President Prabowo Subianto to install Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka. Yet this scenario overlooks constitutional mechanics. Under Article 8 of the 1945 Constitution, if a president resigns, is removed or is permanently incapacitated, the vice president immediately assumes the presidency for the remainder of the term without a general election.
Talk of an "early election" therefore demands a far more radical outcome: the simultaneous removal of both Prabowo and Gibran. Dismissing Prabowo alone does not trigger a national vote, so framing the political horizon around an early election carries fundamentally different constitutional stakes.
Under ordinary calculations, maintaining the Prabowo-Gibran ticket remains the least costly path for both leaders. For Prabowo, avoiding an aggressive purge of Jokowi-aligned figures - including National Police Chief Gen. Listyo Sigit Prabowo - preserves immediate governing stability. For Jokowi, Gibran’s presence secures institutional access and policy continuity. Fracturing this alliance invites immense political uncertainty, elite conflict and unpredictable risks for everyone involved. As long as their relationship remains negotiable, preservation is far cheaper than confrontation.
This raises an obvious question: If Aug. 27 were truly a coordinated push by Jokowi's camp to topple Prabowo, why haven't Prabowo’s key allies - such as Sufmi Dasco Ahmad or Defense Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin - visibly mobilized to counter it?
In high-stakes politics, the absence of an organized defense is revealing. Does the inner circle view the protest as harmless noise, or are certain factions within the state apparatus deliberately allowing the pressure to step up?
